Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Oksana Selekhmeteva vs Emilie Lindh Gallagher Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Selekhmeteva vs Gallagher analysis and find out who is favored!
Oksana Selekhmeteva vs Emilie Lindh Gallagher Important H2H Prediction Stats:
Head-to-head: Selekhmeteva 1 - 0 Gallagher
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Selekhmeteva has won 48.19% of points on his second serve, while Gallagher has won 42.86%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Selekhmeteva, in recent form, has won 60.43% of his opponent's second serve points, while Gallagher has won 63.64%. The same stats for first serve returns are 44.09% and 46.55% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Selekhmeteva has saved 56.05% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Gallagher has saved 69.23% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Selekhmeteva has won 66.67% of matches played (W/L 16/ 8), with Gallagher winning 63.41% (W/L 26/ 15) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Selekhmeteva has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 72% (W/L 46/ 18), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 48% (W/L 13/ 14). Gallagher has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 57% (W/L 125/ 96), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 0% (W/L 0/ 1).
- Player level: In the last year, Selekhmeteva has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 66.67% of matches (W/L 12/ 6), where as Gallagher has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 63.41% of matches (W/L 26/ 15). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Selekhmeteva winning 1 times. They have played 2 sets in total, with Selekhmeteva winning 2 and Gallagher winning 0. The last match between Selekhmeteva and Gallagher was at the W15 Santa Margarita de Montbui, 27-05-2021, Second, Hard with Oksana Selekhmeteva getting the victory 6-2 6-0.
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 0:58:0.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Selekhmeteva and Gallagher have played a deciding set 0 times, with Selekhmeteva winning 0 times and Gallagher 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 0 tiebreaks against each other with Selekhmeteva winning 0, and Gallagher 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Selekhmeteva has played against opponents with an average rank of 349.83 while Gallagher has played against players with an average rank of 240.88.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Selekhmeteva has won 60% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Gallagher has won 57% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Selekhmeteva has converted 47.74% of breakpoint opportunities, and Gallagher has converted 42.86% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
516
Rank
138
High
21
Age
Plays
1
Total0
1
Hard0
0
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
526
Rank
442
High
24
Age
Plays
W
W
W
L
W
W
L
W
W
L
Form
W
W
W
W
L
W
W
L
W
W
66% (137-72)
Career Total W/L
56% (154-121)
67% (16-8)
YTD W/L
100% (2-0)
$179,263
Career Prize Money
$0
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Selekhmeteva VS Gallagher H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions
| stats | Oksana Selekhmeteva | Emilie Lindh Gallagher |
|---|---|---|
| All H2H Matches | 1 | 0 |
| Sets Won | 2 | 0 |
| Games Won | 12 | 2 |
| Aces (Total) | 1 | 0 |
| DFs (Total) | 1 | 2 |
| Avg Match Time | 0:58:0 | 0:58:0 |
| 1st Serve % | 46% (16/35) | 55% (30/55) |
| 1st Serve Win% | 81% (13/16) | 47% (14/30) |
| 2nd Serve Win% | 63% (12/19) | 32% (8/25) |
| BPs Won% (Total) | 40% (6/15) | 100% (1/1) |
| Return Points W% | 60% (33/55) | 29% (10/35) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, W | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (1/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (1/0) |
Selekhmeteva VS Gallagher H2h Matches played
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-2 6-0 |
Stats 
Oksana Selekhmeteva
Player
Emilie Lindh Gallagher
46%
(
16 of
35)
1st Serve %
55%
(
30 of
55)
1
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
2
81%
(
13 of
16)
1st Serve Won
47%
(
14 of
30)
63%
(
12 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
8 of
25)
40%
(
6 of
15)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
29%
(
10 of
35)
Rtn Points Won
60%
(
33 of
55)
58
Total Points Won
32
|
||||
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Oksana Selekhmeteva | Emilie Lindh Gallagher |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 67% (16/8) | 100% (2/0) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 64% (34/19) | 100% (4/0) |
| Games Win/Loss | 56% (281/222) | 71% (24/10) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 70% (16/7) | 0% (0/0) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/1) | 100% (2/0) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0.09 | 0.19 |
| Aces Total | 21 | 3 |
| DFs per game | 0.23 | 0.44 |
| DFs Total | 57 | 7 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:22:23 | 1st Match |
| Avg Opp Rank | 349.83 | 0 |
| 1st Serve % | 70% (915/1302) | 64% (49/77) |
| 1st Serve W% | 59% (540/915) | 59% (29/49) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 48% (186/386) | 43% (12/28) |
| BPs Won% Total | 48% (95/199) | 43% (6/14) |
| Return Pts W% | 50% (672/1350) | 53% (48/91) |
| Slam W/L | 67% (2/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 67% (12/6) | 100% (2/0) |
| Futures W/L | 67% (2/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 67% (16/24) | 100% (2/2) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 60% (3/5) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set W% | 60% (3/5) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, W | 88% (17/15) | 100% (2/2) |
| 1st set W, L | 12% (17/2) | 0% (2/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 14% (7/1) | 0% (0/0) |
Oksana Selekhmeteva Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| QF |
Stats
Katie Volynets
Player
Oksana Selekhmeteva
86%
(
60 of
70)
1st Serve %
68%
(
45 of
66)
0
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
2
58%
(
35 of
60)
1st Serve Won
51%
(
23 of
45)
50%
(
5 of
10)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
7 of
21)
60%
(
6 of
10)
Break Points Won
20%
(
3 of
15)
43%
(
30 of
70)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
36 of
66)
76
Total Points Won
60
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q2 |
Stats
Oksana Selekhmeteva
Player
Daria Snigur
74%
(
45 of
61)
1st Serve %
71%
(
51 of
72)
4
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
4
67%
(
30 of
45)
1st Serve Won
49%
(
25 of
51)
56%
(
9 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
10 of
21)
38%
(
5 of
13)
Break Points Won
13%
(
1 of
8)
36%
(
22 of
61)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
37 of
72)
76
Total Points Won
57
|
6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Oksana Selekhmeteva
Player
Destanee Aiava
66%
(
50 of
76)
1st Serve %
68%
(
63 of
92)
2
Aces
3
4
Double Faults
2
72%
(
36 of
50)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
38 of
63)
38%
(
10 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
13 of
29)
36%
(
4 of
11)
Break Points Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
39%
(
30 of
76)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
41 of
92)
87
Total Points Won
81
|
7-6(5) 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Victoria Jimenez Kasintseva
Player
Oksana Selekhmeteva
64%
(
14 of
22)
1st Serve %
85%
(
34 of
40)
-
Aces
-
1
Double Faults
0
43%
(
6 of
14)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
17 of
34)
25%
(
2 of
8)
2nd Serve Won
83%
(
5 of
6)
33%
(
2 of
6)
Break Points Won
43%
(
3 of
7)
64%
(
14 of
22)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
18 of
40)
26
Total Points Won
36
|
3-6 7-6(4) 7-6(4) | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Oksana Selekhmeteva
Player
Eva Lys
55%
(
29 of
53)
1st Serve %
63%
(
36 of
57)
1
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
4
69%
(
20 of
29)
1st Serve Won
44%
(
16 of
36)
50%
(
12 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
7 of
21)
50%
(
6 of
12)
Break Points Won
29%
(
2 of
7)
40%
(
21 of
53)
Rtn Points Won
60%
(
34 of
57)
66
Total Points Won
44
|
6-4 6-0 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Oksana Selekhmeteva
Player
Ekaterina Yashina
66%
(
31 of
47)
1st Serve %
75%
(
30 of
40)
5
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
1
74%
(
23 of
31)
1st Serve Won
30%
(
9 of
30)
38%
(
6 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
4 of
10)
86%
(
6 of
7)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
38%
(
18 of
47)
Rtn Points Won
68%
(
27 of
40)
56
Total Points Won
31
|
6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Moyuka Uchijima
Player
Oksana Selekhmeteva
63%
(
38 of
60)
1st Serve %
77%
(
44 of
57)
3
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
1
68%
(
26 of
38)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
22 of
44)
45%
(
10 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
6 of
13)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
33%
(
3 of
9)
40%
(
24 of
60)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
29 of
57)
65
Total Points Won
52
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Oksana Selekhmeteva
Player
Carlota Martinez Cirez
73%
(
46 of
63)
1st Serve %
61%
(
36 of
59)
2
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
4
65%
(
30 of
46)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
18 of
36)
53%
(
9 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
8 of
23)
83%
(
5 of
6)
Break Points Won
38%
(
3 of
8)
38%
(
24 of
63)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
33 of
59)
72
Total Points Won
50
|
7-6(2) 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Oksana Selekhmeteva
Player
Mina Hodzic
77%
(
34 of
44)
1st Serve %
70%
(
50 of
71)
1
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
1
62%
(
21 of
34)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
26 of
50)
80%
(
8 of
10)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
8 of
21)
33%
(
5 of
15)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
34%
(
15 of
44)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
37 of
71)
66
Total Points Won
49
|
6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Oksana Selekhmeteva
Player
Nuria Brancaccio
79%
(
30 of
38)
1st Serve %
64%
(
28 of
44)
-
Aces
-
1
Double Faults
3
70%
(
21 of
30)
1st Serve Won
32%
(
9 of
28)
63%
(
5 of
8)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
6 of
16)
55%
(
6 of
11)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
32%
(
12 of
38)
Rtn Points Won
66%
(
29 of
44)
55
Total Points Won
27
|
6-0 6-0 | H2H | ||
view more
Emilie Lindh Gallagher Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| QF |
Stats
Emilie Lindh Gallagher
Player
Daria Khomutsianskaya
64%
(
49 of
77)
1st Serve %
64%
(
58 of
91)
3
Aces
4
7
Double Faults
8
59%
(
29 of
49)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
31 of
58)
43%
(
12 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
12 of
33)
43%
(
6 of
14)
Break Points Won
31%
(
4 of
13)
47%
(
36 of
77)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
48 of
91)
89
Total Points Won
79
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 | 6-1 6-2 | H2H | |||
| QF |
Stats
Xinyu Gao
Player
Emilie Lindh Gallagher
57%
(
26 of
46)
1st Serve %
59%
(
34 of
58)
2
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
6
77%
(
20 of
26)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
21 of
34)
60%
(
12 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
12 of
24)
29%
(
2 of
7)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
30%
(
14 of
46)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
25 of
58)
57
Total Points Won
47
|
7-6(3) 2-1 ret. | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Emilie Lindh Gallagher
Player
Francisca Jorge
65%
(
30 of
46)
1st Serve %
54%
(
36 of
67)
5
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
2
87%
(
26 of
30)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
21 of
36)
50%
(
8 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
12 of
31)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
26%
(
12 of
46)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
34 of
67)
68
Total Points Won
45
|
6-0 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Emilie Lindh Gallagher
Player
Gergana Topalova
55%
(
37 of
67)
1st Serve %
51%
(
37 of
72)
6
Aces
3
7
Double Faults
5
86%
(
32 of
37)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
25 of
37)
43%
(
13 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
51%
(
18 of
35)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
33%
(
22 of
67)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
29 of
72)
74
Total Points Won
65
|
1-6 6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
| F |
Stats
Linda Klimovicova
Player
Emilie Lindh Gallagher
53%
(
51 of
97)
1st Serve %
62%
(
49 of
79)
7
Aces
4
5
Double Faults
4
71%
(
36 of
51)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
31 of
49)
52%
(
24 of
46)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
11 of
30)
67%
(
6 of
9)
Break Points Won
43%
(
3 of
7)
38%
(
37 of
97)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
37 of
79)
97
Total Points Won
79
|
6-3 6-7(5) 6-1 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Emilie Lindh Gallagher
Player
Maileen Nuudi
61%
(
46 of
76)
1st Serve %
76%
(
63 of
83)
3
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
3
74%
(
34 of
46)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
37 of
63)
53%
(
16 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
10 of
20)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
17%
(
1 of
6)
34%
(
26 of
76)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
36 of
83)
86
Total Points Won
73
|
6-2 3-6 6-1 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Emilie Lindh Gallagher
Player
Georgia Pedone
56%
(
30 of
54)
1st Serve %
71%
(
37 of
52)
1
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
2
70%
(
21 of
30)
1st Serve Won
43%
(
16 of
37)
46%
(
11 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
6 of
15)
67%
(
6 of
9)
Break Points Won
43%
(
3 of
7)
41%
(
22 of
54)
Rtn Points Won
58%
(
30 of
52)
62
Total Points Won
44
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Emilie Lindh Gallagher
Player
Lisa Pigato
53%
(
26 of
49)
1st Serve %
80%
(
59 of
74)
4
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
6
77%
(
20 of
26)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
32 of
59)
57%
(
13 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
27%
(
4 of
15)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
100%
(
2 of
2)
33%
(
16 of
49)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
38 of
74)
71
Total Points Won
52
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Emilie Lindh Gallagher
Player
Viktoria Morvayova
47%
(
32 of
68)
1st Serve %
53%
(
48 of
91)
3
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
5
84%
(
27 of
32)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
33 of
48)
61%
(
22 of
36)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
20 of
43)
22%
(
2 of
9)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
28%
(
19 of
68)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
38 of
91)
87
Total Points Won
72
|
7-6(1) 6-4 | H2H | ||
view more
Selekhmeteva Vs Gallagher Prediction H2H Images To Share
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
